A family death always lays bare
those that are left behind, and what it reveals is not
necessarily pretty – particularly when there is money
at stake. The contents of a will can bring out a
sudden venality in the most apparently unworldly
people. This vexed issue of family inheritance is at
the heart of Ronald Harwood’s four-hander, first
performed in 1998.
Two sisters, downtrodden Edith (Beverley Klein) and
glamorous Renata (Katharine Rogers), reunite after
their mother’s death at her bizarre house made of old
railway carriages, and learn from the local solicitor
(Walter van Dyk) that her estate is to be divided
equally between them. This seems fair, but is it?
Edith is poor and Renata is rich. Edith has been her
mother’s carer, while Renata has merely been her
daughter. It is impossible to argue that Edith does
not deserve the inheritance more than Renata, but is
inheritance really a question of deserving?
Furthermore, would it be right for Edith to deny a
dying woman’s wishes and fight for her own future, to
make underhand use of the mysterious antiques expert
(Gregory Gudgeon) who sees potential in her mother’s
vast collection of bric-a-brac? These are the themes
the play examines, with the central role of Edith an
intriguing Anita Brookner-type character who gradually
grasps that her qualities of meek goodness merit scant
reward in a world that values brash, bold Renata.
All of Ronald Harwood’s work –
from his breakthrough play The Dresser to the
recently filmed Quartet – is characterised by
a kindly, humane perceptiveness, and Equally
Divided is no exception. Nevertheless it is not
a substantial piece. Indeed it feels like a one-act
play that has been unnaturally extended. Its
wordiness, however eloquent, cannot disguise the fact
that another dimension is lacking, whether it be a
complicating sub-plot or simply a less inevitable
progression of events.
This production by
Brigid Larmour, artistic director at Watford Palace,
makes some use of the effectively bleak, low-ceilinged
set (by Ruari Murchison), and allows Beverley Klein a
strong moment of pathos when she recalls the
passionless one-off encounter that comprises her
emotional history. On the whole, however, the piece is
played for laughs, rather in the style of a sitcom, as
when much business is created from Renata’s flagrant
smoking and Edith’s frenzied window opening.
Harmlessly entertaining, but perhaps not the best way
to elicit theatrical subtleties.
Money may make the world turn
around more smoothly on its axis but it can create an
avalanche of jagged emotions within a family. Take the
two sisters in Ronald Harwood's 1998 comedy – though
tragicomedy might be a fairer description. Their
parents were refugees from Hitler's Europe but are now
dead, their mother only recently. They appear to be
joint inheritrices, though their life patterns have
diverged extraordinarily.
The sister we meet first is
frumpy Edith, the stay-at-home daughter – home being a
south-coast house made out of old railway carriages.
She has been her mother's companion and, latterly, her
carer. Renata flew the nest early on, has made wealthy
marriages (and even more lucrative divorce
settlements); she simply came for the funeral and the
reading of the will. That vital document is in the
care of the family solicitor Charles, a widower with
an attention-span strongly resembling cotton-wool.
Laughs there are a-plenty, but the underlying dilemmas
for all three – and for the
actor-turned-antique-dealer invited by Edith to give
an independent valuation – are serious enough. We all
know carer-daughters who somehow miss out on the lives
their siblings enjoy. Some of us have had dealings
with solicitors whose mental world seems so far
removed from that of their clients that you wonder how
they ever managed to pass the Law Society's
examinations. And, as for the antiques expert...
Brigid Larmour's production
gives a fair crack of the theatrical whip to each
character in turn. Beverley Klein's Edith dominates –
and you end up being completely on her side, though
her two monologues do tend to be over-stretched out.
But it's a rounded portrait of someone who, both in
real life and onstage, can be treated as someone
easily passed over and ignored. Katharine Rogers has
the right sort of spiky elegance as Renata, a worldly
woman who knows her rights – and can judge a man (any
man) in an instance. If Charles bumbles and fumbles,
and Walter van Dyk certainly makes him the epitome of
that, then Gregory Gudgeon as Fabian is Lovejoy with
quotes, spouting verse at the drop of a cue in between
checking makers' marks on anything from a Hepplewhite
table to a coffee pot or enamelled miniature. Gudgeon
has in many ways the easiest part; you know from the
beginning that Fabian is a rogue, but you warm to his
own enjoyment of his preposterous personality.
The set by Ruari
Murchison is long, low and narrow. It suggests its
inhabitants' ability to combine a degree of
improvisation and making-do with an all-important gemütlich.
Now what was a home with comforts has become a prison,
for Edith at any rate. Harwood leaves us guessing as
to how she will escape, if she does. We are, after
all, in 1997, which was supposed to mark the start of
a brave new world. I wonder what happened to it.
Opinions are likely to be equally divided over
the moral dilemma thrown up in Ronald Harwood’s play
about warring sisters squabbling over the estate of
their mother. The premise behind Equally Divided,
at Watford Palace Theatre, isn’t new but perhaps the
re-telling of the story is.
For the past 15 years Edith, a dowdy
50-something spinster, has cared for her invalid
mother in a ramshackle seaside home made from
redundant railway carriages. Typically she has
sacrificed her own chance of happiness, love and a
career to be the stay-at-home carer and she is
bristling with resentment and jealousy - for no
matter what she did the old battle-axe, who had a
penchant for collecting antiques, favoured Renata,
the glamorous other daughter.Now the old girl is
gone and Renata and Edith discover that the estate,
such as it is, is being equally divided.It’s a
bitter blow to Edith who has no savings and was
relying on the will to carry her through her old
age. Renata, on the other hand, has homes in London
and France, a multi-million pay-off from a divorce
and is sitting very comfortably. What’s more, she
had left Edith to cope with mother while she went
off and had a life. It’s all so unfair.
Director Brigid Larmour has coaxed some fine
performances from her cast of four. Beverley Klein,
as Edith, has the lion’s share of the work. On stage
pretty much throughout the 110-minute drama she
gives an engrossing performance as a honest women
consumed by jealousy.“The theme of the 20th
century,” she says, “is the shallowness of decency”
and it turns out that perhaps desperation forces the
most decent into moral corruption.
Katharine Rogers as Renata has little to do other
than behave outrageously. She has one moment of
clarity, between glasses of vino, when she tries for
an earnest conversation with her sister that serves to
reveal the cause of the women’s animosity to each
other. The two men on the scene, wet solicitor Charles
(Walter Van Dyk), and actor turned antiques dealer
Fabian (Gregory Gudgeon) are little more than window
dressing but I enjoyed Gudgeon’s performance as “an
old rogue” who, one hopes, might give Edith the happy
ending she craves. All the characters are deeply
flawed and sympathies change as they reveal more of
themselves. It’s a thought-provoking and deceptively
complex little piece that takes a while to engage,
picking up nicely in the second act.